
Residents Left Frustrated by Martin Wrigley’s Response
“We won’t be able to stop them” – MP’s words leave residents frustrated.
The Meeting
When campaigners met with Martin Wrigley MP, they came with clear asks:
-
Public assurance that any new quarry proposal would be judged under today’s laws, not yesterday’s mineral rights.
-
Written support for enforcing 110% biodiversity net gain, protecting bat corridors, and applying full scrutiny to flood and hydrology risks.
-
Help convening a round table with the Environment Agency, Natural England, Devon County Council, and residents.
The Response
What they got instead left residents frustrated:
-
Martin declined to back residents publicly, citing “neutrality.”
-
He suggested the project may already be a “done deal” and said: “we won’t be able to stop them.”
-
He dismissed the relevance of Teignbridge planning policies – despite these being material considerations in county-level decisions.
-
He refused to write to the Environment Agency or press for enforcement on biodiversity net gain, saying that would simply be asking agencies to “do their job.”
- He has ghosted us on the request for a round table providing open transparent community engagement
Why It Matters
Words like “we won’t be able to stop them” risk demobilising residents before the legal tests are even applied. In reality:
-
Historic mineral rights are not a free pass. Dormant permissions require full modern review.
-
Councils can issue Prohibition Orders if workings have permanently ceased.
-
The company must meet today’s requirements on flood risk, biodiversity net gain, health and dust monitoring, and bat connectivity.
It looks and feels like a line is being pushed that this is inevitable. We will not accept that narrative.
Save Our Trees CampaignThe Bottom Line
Residents were left disappointed, but not defeated. The campaign is clear: this is not a done deal. If an application is submitted, it will face today’s strict standards. If it cannot meet them, it must be refused.
More Updates
